Featured Posts

Fixing the Government and Private Healthcare System The US health care system boasts some of the most advanced technology, procedures and pharmaceuticals in the world, but is in urgent need of a checkup. We have more than 40...

Readmore

HumanaOne's new Short Term Medical health insurance A press release from Humana out today introduces their new short term health insurance plan. HumanaOne wants to help people who have lost their jobs recently due to the economic...

Readmore

WellCare to pay $80 million for Medicaid fraud WellCare was accused for falsely inflating expenditure information submitted to Florida Medicaid between 2002 and 2006. Money that was supposed to be used to provide medical...

Readmore

Study shows that recent grads don't know their health... According to a UnitedHealth Group poll, more than half of young adults surveyed lack information about their options for health insurance. The poll surveyed 1,000 young adults...

Readmore

Health Plan One's Most Popular Plans Health Plan One offers the most competitive prices in the health insurance broker industry. They offer affordable prices to consumers from the most popular plans. Plans...

Readmore

Enter Zip Code:      Individual & Family

Health Plan One Get Health Insurance Quotes

Molina to expand to 5 new states

Posted on : February 24, 2010 | By : Bill Stapleton | In : Health Insurance

0

Molina Healthcare is expanding to five more states: Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, New Jersey, and West Virginia.  This was the result of a merger for Molina to take over Unisys Corporation’s Health Information Management (HIM) business, according to Hispanic Business Online.  These 900 employees will now work for Molina Healthcare, enabling Molina to go to a state Medicaid agency and offer processing information and eligibility, disease management programs and enrolling patients as well as a nurse advice line.  Molina said they can “do a hybrid where it’s not really an HMO product but we can deliver some of the HMO services to state patients.”  Today, 1.45 million members are served by Molina.  The deal will end by the first half of the year.

From: Hispanic Business News

To view Molina Healthcare plans, visit our Molina Healthcare page.

CHIP help being offered in Mississippi

Posted on : February 19, 2010 | By : Bill Stapleton | In : Health Insurance

0

According to HarriesburgAmerican.com, the Mississippi Health Advocacy Program released a program as of February 19, 2010 to help parents with the application process of CHIP (Children’s Health Insurance Program). The program is called Health Help for Kids and it is designed to provide assistance and resources to parents who are in need of CHIP, a Medicaid program for Mississippi’s children, used in cases where parents’ income is too high to qualify for Medicaid, but too low to cover the cost of individual insurance.

Fake health insurance plan scams?

Posted on : February 16, 2010 | By : Bill Stapleton | In : Health Insurance

0

The Early Show this morning on CNN did a segment regarding health insurance scams, which seem to be on the rise in the current economic state. One group, called the American Trade Association was pinpointed as a scam, trying to sell fake health insurance. The ATA charged for monthly premiums, promising a limited benefit and comprehensive medical plan in return. When situations arose where policy holders needed medical procedures, they were out of luck. The insurance was fake. You can read the full story at CBS online.

Before you buy health insurance, it is important to make sure the company is licensed. Health Plan One assures its customers that every single company we represent is licensed to sell health insurance. When you apply through a plan through our website, please know that all your options are through legitimate health insurance companies.

Tennessee and other states may see Medicaid cuts – Hospitals ask to be taxed

Posted on : February 16, 2010 | By : Bill Stapleton | In : Health Insurance, Medicaid

0

Cuts may be ahead for TennCare, Tennessee’s Medicaid program, according to the Wall Street Journal Health Blog. In attempts to offset the cuts to TennCare, Tennessee hospitals may ask to pay higher taxes on hospital revenues, though the rate right now is unclear. The WSJ blog forsees cuts at the federal levl, if Medicaid cuts on the state level persist.

The hospital tax, according to Tennnesean.com, expired in 1994, when TennCare was created. Though these cuts would save the state approximately $380 million, they would really be costing Tennessee as much as three times more in federal aid. Hospitals have estimated around $526 million in state and federal funding this year and according to Craig Becker, the president of the Tennessee Hospital Association, some state services and hospitals will disappear, which is why the new tax is being proposed.

Tennessee is not the only state facing Medicaid costs. According to the Virginian-Pilot, rising health care costs and a growth in the number of Medicaid patients have increased the government’s obligation to pay over $750 million within the past two years. New Hampshire and Wisconsin as well may see state-level Medicaid cuts, according to a post in KaiserHealthnews.org.

Health Care Debate in Stamford, CT

Posted on : February 3, 2010 | By : Bill Stapleton | In : Health Insurance

0

Debicella vs. Himes and Lamont

On Monday night I had the pleasure of attending the health care debate between congressman Jim Himes, Ned Lamont, and State Senator Dan Debicella. The participants offered up a comprehensive review of Democratic and Republican talking points that are worth a quick analysis. We’ll start with the Democratic talking points:

1. We have a moral obligation to cover all those without insurance.

I think many Americans agree with that statement. And we actually do cover all Americans today because no one can get turned away in an emergency room. A related question to ask is: why don’t these Americans have insurance? In many states, like Connecticut – and in Massachusetts prior to healthcare reform – almost half of the uninsured individuals are, in fact, eligible for Medicaid. They may not sign up because the state makes it difficult to enroll or the individual does not take the time to enroll. It seems like one prescription for our health care problem is: let’s get people enrolled in a program we have today.

The next big batch of uninsured Americans is illegal aliens. This is one of the toughest issues in healthcare reform – what do we do with the 10-15 million illegal aliens in the United States that do not have health insurance. I wish I had a prescription but unfortunately there is no easy answer on this one. The next batch of the uninsured are “risk takers.” Unfortunately, the risk takers are risking the taxpayers’ money and the money of those who are insured, not their own. If they get really sick we treat them anyway! A prescription for this problem is, in fact, a mandate. Finally, the rest of the uninsured population is people who are too sick to qualify for health insurance. Those people need financial assistance.

2. We need more competition (more insurance companies). Therefore, we need a public option.

Interesting point but completely irrelevant in Connecticut. In Connecticut’s individual insurance market we have Cigna, Aetna, Connecticare, Anthem Blue Cross, Time Assurant, Celtic, Golden Rule, and a few other no-names. Clearly, lack of competition is not a problem. So I’m not sure why Himes raised this talking point.

3. Insurance companies are bad.

Congressman Himes skewered the insurance companies; referring to their “pernicious” practices of rescinding policies after issuing them. In reality, this practice of “rescission” is rare. At Health Plan One, we have sold thousands and thousands of policies and have never had one client’s policy rescinded. Rescission occurs in the event of fraud perpetrated on the insurance company and its policyholders. For example, if an insurance applicant has cancer and intentionally misrepresents his/her condition, an insurance company may face hundreds of thousands of dollars of liability and has one of two choices: rescind the policy, due to fraud or take those losses and charge all their honest customers. Pretty easy choice for the policyholders and insurance company. Not sure who Mr. Himes thinks should pay for insurance fraud?

4. Medicare represents a $40 trillion unfunded liability.

Wow! Kudos to Congressman Himes for bringing this up. He got off the talkpoint memo. The insolvency of Medicare and $40 trillion unfunded liability is our ultimate problem and everything else we’re doing is working on the margins. Unfortunately, after announcing this financial bomb, the Congressman had no solutions other than to cut Medicare Advantage which is a cut to seniors’ benefits, but sounds like cuts to the insurers which is more politically palatable. He offers no clear solutions for a big problem.

5. Eliminate preexisting conditions.

Good idea. Who’s going to pay for it? You can’t have a functioning insurance market with no preexisting conditions unless you mandate that everyone gets in the insurance pool. For proof, go to the New York insurance department where they implemented no pre-existing conditions. Every insurer in the state has moved out and prices are 10 times what they are in Connecticut or Pennsylvania. The weak $750 mandate will not be sufficient to obligate people to buy health insurance.

Republican talking points:

Senator Debicella started out strong with the salient point that escalating costs are the key problem. Then, on to Republican talk points:

1. Tort Reform

The cornerstone of any Republican plan is tort reform. Certainly a good idea and should be part of any plan. Reduce physician costs and mitigate wasteful defensive medicine.

2. Electronic medical records (also a Democratic talking point)

EMRs are a good idea and cost a lot of money, but they might save a lot of money in the future.

3. Buying insurance across state lines.

Great idea if you live in NY, RI, VT, and a whole bunch of states that have blown up their individual insurance market. You have to fire a lot of state regulators, though, so Dems hate this idea.

4. Introducing high deductible plans.

This is a great point. Higher deductible plans have lower premiums and introduce the concept of cost-sharing to the consumer. For example, at Health Plan One, we carry many high quality, high deductible plans that are great options, especially for younger consumers who are healthy. Reducing health care costs must include patient cost-sharing and innovation on health benefit designs. Current congressional bills prohibit this.

5. Wellness (also a Democratic talk point)

Who could argue with wellness? Wellness is a great idea but you’ve got to have a plan to implement it. Close McDonald’s?

Prospective governor talk points:

Mr. Lamont made it very clear he will run for governor. He pointed out that Connecticut has not created a lot of jobs over the last 20 years and believes that the high cost of health care is part of the problem. We’ve heard a lot about the problems which were largely accurate but the prescription is unclear.

A fun event but, unfortunately, Congressman Himes could not adequately defend the House or Senate health care bills that he wants to pass.

Score one for Debicella – start again!

Health care reform at the state level

Posted on : February 3, 2010 | By : Bill Stapleton | In : Health Insurance

0

There is a lot of buzz lately regarding health insurance reform on the state level. The Washington Post reports that Virginia’s state Senate passed three bills on Monday that would make it illegal to require individuals to purchase health insurance.

In Utah, Republican leaders are looking to develop their own plan for health care reform – part of it urging Obama to allow with the right to create such a plan at the state level.

Medicaid needs copay help

Posted on : February 2, 2010 | By : Bill Stapleton | In : Health Insurance

0

In Maggie Mahar’s post yesterday, Medicaid Needs More Than A Short-term Fix, she highlights the dire straits most state Medicaid programs are in (for example, despite a Medicaid enrollment increase of 18 percent over the past year in Arizona, the state has stopped enrolling children).

Medicaid is an out of control program that is bankrupting state and federal governments. The befits are similar to those of private insurance, but for free. The program will not allow copayments to change behavior, but without them, the systems are falling apart. Here in Connecticut, if you take a ride down to Bridgeport of Yale New Haven hospitals on a Friday afternoon and check out the ER you will see how jammed it is. Services for a majority of these people will be performed without so much as a copay. Even a copay of $5 could make a significant difference to the program. As head of Health Net Medicaid, I was sued regularly for trying to implement such ideas, but if something doesn’t change, these programs will continue to go bankrupt.

Provider Monopolies

Posted on : February 1, 2010 | By : Bill Stapleton | In : Health Insurance

0

A true microcosm of the United States, Connecticut deals with the issue of provider monopolies when it comes to hospital networks. We have allowed hospitals all across the country to create player unions. For example, Yale New Haven, Greenwich, and Bridgeport hospitals are banded together for contracting purposes. There is really no negotiation between these hospitals and the health plans – as the hospitals tell health plans what the price of service will be and do not let health plans charge more to patients using higher cost facilities.

Connecticut’s strict Certificate of Need (CON) laws prevent new competition from entering the market. CON approval, regardless of cost, is required for anyone acquiring, purchasing, or accepting donation of a CT scanner, PET scanner, PET/CT scanner, or similar new technology equipment (see more about the Certificate of Need Process from the department of insurance). The CON board is controlled by the hospitals, making it even more impossible for new competition to enter the market.

This market power of the hospital oligopolies is one reason why the public option is so dangerous to private insurers. A public option would reduce unit costs below private insurers and quickly put them out of business, removing competition altogether.