Featured Posts

Chicago's Innovative Model for Urban Medical Care Working Chicago’s innovative plan to help deliver better medical care to its urban poor and decrease overall costs is proving more successful than critics originally anticipated....

Readmore

Missouri Referendum Rejects Individual Mandate Last Tuesday August 3, 2010 Missouri voters overwhelmingly approved Proposition C, a ballot measure that would prohibit the state government from requiring residents to have...

Readmore

Will Obama Fund Abortions in High Risk Insurance Pools? The debate over whether the new federally-funded high risk pool programs will allow funding for member’s elective abortions continues. The mandatory state high risk pools...

Readmore

What Does SPF Really Mean? Summertime and warm weather means a lot of time spent outdoors in the sun.  More exposure to the sun and its UV rays means you are going to need greater protection for your...

Readmore

The Medical World Goes Green …Or at least it’s on its way to it.  In the 1990s it was reported that doctor’s offices and hospitals in the US produced 2 million tons of medical waste per year! ...

Readmore

TwitterFriendFeedLinkedIn
DiggStumbleUponSubscribe via RSS

Attacking the Demagoguery of Health Insurers by Government Officials and Press

Posted on : April 26, 2010 | By : Bill Stapleton | In : Politics

Tags: ,

0

Finally a health insurance company competently defends themselves from egregious claims against it. HHS (Health and Human Services) Secretary Sebelius and Reuters accuse WellPoint of specifically targeting women with breast cancer to drop their policies. For the counterclaim by WellPoint, please see link.

WellPoint goes on to say that when people fraudulently fill out applications it’s their duty to review those applications. They have a very thorough and professional process, and exercise a high level of due diligence on those review cases. And in fact the charge of dropping policies is not even what the case is about; it’s about rescinding policies where there is fraud involved.  What Sebelius does not understand is that for a health insurer to detect fraud is protecting the policy holders of the company. If someone has a $50,000 claim for an illness, in the end it would not be the insurance company that would pay for that claim. Ultimately it is the other policy holders who pay.

It’s only fitting that Angela Braly, the CEO of WellPoint, makes a very strong response to Sebelius. It was in fact Braly that allowed the California subsidiary to put through rate increases of up to 39% that gave the congress and Obama administration the renewed fuel to pass health reform that was believed to be all but dead in February. Better late than never?